Notice: fwrite(): Write of 1126 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php on line 42

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the math-captcha domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

WordPress database error: [Disk full (/tmp/#sql-temptable-20e-38bff-35.MAI); waiting for someone to free some space... (errno: 28 "No space left on device")]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_wfLiveTrafficHuman`

WordPress database error: [Disk full (/tmp/#sql-temptable-20e-38bff-36.MAI); waiting for someone to free some space... (errno: 28 "No space left on device")]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_wfLiveTrafficHuman`

WordPress database error: [Disk full (/tmp/#sql-temptable-20e-38bff-37.MAI); waiting for someone to free some space... (errno: 28 "No space left on device")]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_options`

IT – Page 21 – A changelog by Daniel Mettler

IBM models for Neptun IV announced

IBM models for Neptun IV – autumn/fall 2004 (Neptun site)

I think IBM’s notebooks are better than my current notebook/TabletPC m200 by Toshiba. Some quick notes about the IBM notebooks above:

IBM X40:

+ small, lightweight
+ SD card reader
+ long battery runtime
+ Bluetooth
– relatively weak CPU, only a 1.2 GHz Pentium M (not a Dothan core)
– small HDD
– very weak graphics chip (Intel Extrem Graphics 2)
– no DVI out (only VGA)
– bad design (tapered/slanted bottom/keyboard)
– no external drives included
– has a trackpoint, but no touchpad

IBM T42 medium:

+ nice and fast CPU (Pentium M 735 Dothan)
+ Bluetooth
0 CD-RW/ DVD-ROM Combodrive (adds weight; should be a DVD+/-RW nowadays)
0 moderate weight (neither lightweight nor very heavy)
– small HDD
– low resolution screen (only 1024×768 even if it’s 14.1″)
– average GPU (ATI Mobility Radeon 7500/32 – equals in about a Nvidia FX Go 5200, but without DirectX9 support)
– short battery runtime
– no DVI out (only VGA)

IBM T42 large:

+ nice and fast CPU (Pentium M 735 Dothan)
+ Bluetooth
+ high resolution screen (1400×1050/14.1″ ideal! – 1400×1050 is more adequate for a 14.1″ than for a 12.1″ screen such as with my Toshiba M200)
0 CD-RW/ DVD-ROM Combodrive (adds weight; should be a DVD+/-RW nowadays)
0 moderate weight (neither lightweight nor very heavy)
0 average/large HDD
0 long battery runtime (though only thanks to a 9-cell battery pack)
– fast GPU (ATI Mobility Radeon 9600/64 – drawback: demands a lot of battery power. IBM should have included the ATI Mobility Radeon 9700/64 like Apple with its Powerbooks. The 9700 uses less power and is even faster than the 9600.)
– the 9-cell battery pack increases the depth of the notebook (huh? despite of a decreasing battery runtime, they should have rather used a standard size battery pack IMHO)
– no DVI out (only VGA)

I’m curious how the Apple models will look like. The biggest plus of an Apple Powerbook is probably its nice overall design and well-balanced, powerful functionality and of course MacOS X (which is the only truly user-friendly OS at the moment). The biggest minus is the fact that everybody is expecting a soon release of 1.) a dual-core G4 Powerbook 2.) a single-core G5/64bit Powerbook. So people eventually decide to wait another half a year.

Registration opened for OSCOM 4 in Zürich

OSCOM – OSCOM 4 in Zürich, Switzerland (Sept 29th – Oct 1st, 2004)

I attended OSCOM 1 back in 2002 which I remember as an interesting and “crispy” conference. I’m not sure whether I’ll have time to attend OSCOM 4 though. Further there aren’t any student/early bird discounts (a somewhat strange marketing policy for a) a OSS community event and b) considering that ETH is a public university). A wise decision? We’ll see..

(via Gregor)

XP SP2’s Data Execution Prevention and Performance Hits

Did you notice a severe performance decrease after having installed Windows XP SP2? You’re not alone. Unfortunately, I lack the time for an in-depth performance comparison of XP with and without SP2. So I just ran the demo benchmark of 3DMark2001, once with SP2’s new Data Execution Prevention (DEP) enabled, once disabled (I rebooted my box before running each test).

3DMark2001 results on my box (higher values are better; the absolute values don’t matter here unless you’re interested in the absolute 3DMark2001 performance of a Toshiba Portégé M200 with 768 MB of RAM):

XP SP2 with DEP disabled (AlwaysOff): 4601
XP SP2 with DEP enabled (OptOut OptIn, i.e. the default setting for SP2): 3299

Oh my! I did expect a performance decrease, but not such a big one! And it’s even a 3D benchmark (“normal” application benchmarks might even show worse results for DEP)! So, according to these measurements (don’t quote these measured results please; they’re statistically not significant as I haven’t measured a series of test-runs, only one run per test), enabling DEP (enabled by default after installing XP SP2) results in almost 30% lower 3DMark2001 performance! It’s your choice whether the improved security of your box is worth this huge performance hit. For a server it might be (it’s still alarming though), but for my M200 TabletPC, it definitely isn’t. If you like to disable it too, here’s how to do it:

1. disable write-protection of c:\boot.ini (see the properties dialog)
2. in c:\boot.ini, replace “/NoExecute=OptIn” by “/NoExecute=AlwaysOff” using a text editor (e.g. notepad)

Further details about how to enable/disable DEP on a per-application basis are explained on this page at microsoft.com.

PS. Note that a similar execution protection for Linux, Ingo Molnar’s exec-shield, affords a performance decrease of a few percents only. I really wonder how MS managed to burn that many clock cycles..


Notice: fwrite(): Write of 1126 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php on line 42

Fatal error: Uncaught wfWAFStorageFileException: Unable to verify temporary file contents for atomic writing. in /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php:51 Stack trace: #0 /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php(658): wfWAFStorageFile::atomicFilePutContents() #1 [internal function]: wfWAFStorageFile->saveConfig() #2 {main} thrown in /var/www/news.numlock.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php on line 51